Asus TUF Gaming A15 (FA507)
Rs. 100,000–135,000 (indicative)
Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED (N6506)
Rs. 150,000–200,000 (indicative)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 (FA507) vs Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED (N6506)
Quick verdict
Based on 6 scored categories
1 categories won
Asus TUF Gaming A15 (FA507)
Rs. 100,000–135,000 (indicative) · Warranty: verify
Stronger on: Battery & charging
CameraNo data
GamingTie
Battery & chargingWins
Display—
Value for moneyNo data
Software & longevity—
2 categories won
Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED (N6506)
Rs. 150,000–200,000 (indicative) · Warranty: verify
Stronger on: Display, Software & longevity
CameraNo data
GamingTie
Battery & charging—
DisplayWins
Value for moneyNo data
Software & longevityWins
Too close to call overall — these two trade blows. Decide by the one category that matters most to you below.
Price comparison
Asus TUF Gaming A15 (FA507)Rs. 100,000–135,000 (indicative)
Market range: Rs. 100,000–135,000 (indicative)
Price on request
Not yet price-verified
Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED (N6506)Rs. 150,000–200,000 (indicative)
Market range: Rs. 150,000–200,000 (indicative)
Price on request
Not yet price-verified
We show the lowest verified Nepal price with its check date, plus the market range. Where a price is unverified we say so — never a guess. How we price →
Winner by category
CameraNo data
Not scored yet
We do not have verified data to score this category for these two phones.
GamingVery close
Too close to call
Both land within a few points (74 vs 74) — treat them as equal here.
Battery & chargingA15 (FA507)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 (FA507)
A15 (FA507) scores higher on battery (100/100) — — with — charging.
DisplayOLED (N6506)
Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED (N6506)
OLED (N6506) has the better display — — —.
Value for moneyNo data
Not scored yet
We do not have verified data to score this category for these two phones.
Software & longevityOLED (N6506)
Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED (N6506)
OLED (N6506) is the safer long-term pick (82/100) — Windows 11.
Key differences
A15 (FA507)
OLED (N6506)
Rs. 100,000–135,000 (indicative)
Price
Rs. 150,000–200,000 (indicative)
—
Display
—
—
Chipset
—
—
Main camera
—
— · —
Battery
— · —
Windows 11
Software
Windows 11
No
5G
No
Full specs
Spec
A15 (FA507)
OLED (N6506)
Size
—
—
Type
—
—
Resolution
—
—
Protection
—
—
Spec
A15 (FA507)
OLED (N6506)
Chipset
—
—
CPU
—
—
GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3050 / 4050 / 4060 (8GB GDDR6)
NVIDIA RTX 3050 / 4050 / 4060 (8GB, MUX, Studio drivers)
Storage
512GB-1TB M.2 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD
1-2TB M.2 NVMe SSD
Card slot
—
—
Spec
A15 (FA507)
OLED (N6506)
Main camera
—
—
Features
—
—
Video
—
—
Spec
A15 (FA507)
OLED (N6506)
Battery
—
—
Charging
—
—
Spec
A15 (FA507)
OLED (N6506)
Network
—
—
SIM
—
—
Features
—
—
Spec
A15 (FA507)
OLED (N6506)
OS
Windows 11
Windows 11
Dimensions
15.6" chassis
15.6" chassis
Weight
~2.2 kg
1.8 kg
Build
Plastic; MIL-STD-810H
Aluminum
Colors
Mecha Gray, Jaeger Gray
Earl Grey
Released
—
—
Better alternatives
If neither is the right fit, these are worth a look:
MSI Prestige 16 AI Studio (B1V)
Price on request
Higher overall score (83.4/10) than both phones here.
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (GA403)
Price on request
Higher overall score (81.8/10) than both phones here.
Frequently asked questions
These two are closely matched overall. If value matters most, take the cheaper one; if you want the best camera or gaming, follow the category winner above. Both prices are verified with the date checked.
Asus TUF Gaming A15 (FA507) scores 0/100 on camera; Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED (N6506) scores 0/100. Scores are from sensor specs and review consensus — not invented results.
Each card shows the lowest verified Nepal price and the date we checked it, plus the market range. Unverified prices are labelled "on request" — we never fabricate one.
Use our Phone Finder — answer 5 quick questions and get matches for your budget and priorities. Open Phone Finder →
Category winners use official spec data and published review scores, with Nepal price-verification where available. Camera and gaming scores are sensor/chipset-based; real lab tests are added as we run them. Prices are indicative and may differ at point of sale. Methodology → · Affiliate disclosure →