Honor 400 Pro
Rs. 88,480
vs
Honor 90 Pro
Rs. 65,000–82,000 (indicative)
Change

Honor 400 Pro vs Honor 90 Pro

Prices verified for Nepal · Scored across 6 categories
Quick verdict Based on 6 scored categories
3 categories won
Honor 400 Pro
Rs. 88,480 · Seller warranty — confirm
Stronger on: Gaming, Battery & charging, Software & longevity
Camera
GamingWins
Battery & chargingWins
Display
Value for moneyNo data
Software & longevityWins
2 categories won
Honor 90 Pro
Rs. 65,000–82,000 (indicative) · Warranty: verify
Stronger on: Camera, Display
CameraWins
Gaming
Battery & charging
DisplayWins
Value for moneyNo data
Software & longevity
Too close to call overall — these two trade blows. Decide by the one category that matters most to you below.

Price comparison

Honor 400 Pro
Rs. 88,480
Market range: Rs. 88,499 (indicative)
Warranty: confirm
Checked May 29
View phone
Honor 90 Pro
Rs. 65,000–82,000 (indicative)
Market range: Rs. 65,000–82,000 (indicative)
Price on request
Not yet price-verified
View phone
We show the lowest verified Nepal price with its check date, plus the market range. Where a price is unverified we say so — never a guess. How we price →

Winner by category

Camera90 Pro
Honor 90 Pro
90 Pro leads on camera (90/100 vs 70/100). 200MP wide (f/1.9, PDAF) + 32MP telephoto (2.5x optical, OIS) + 12MP ultrawide (112°) vs 200MP OIS + 50MP 3x tele OIS + 12MP UW.
Scores are based on sensor specs and review consensus, not our own lab photos yet.
Gaming400 Pro
Honor 400 Pro
400 Pro is stronger for gaming (97/100 vs 89/100) — Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 handles heavy titles like PUBG better.
Chipset-based estimate; real sustained-FPS testing not available yet.
Battery & charging400 Pro
Honor 400 Pro
400 Pro scores higher on battery (87/100) — 5300mAh (Si/C) with 100W wired, 50W wireless charging.
Display90 Pro
Honor 90 Pro
90 Pro has the better display — 6.78 inches AMOLED, 120Hz.
Value for moneyNo data
Not scored yet
We do not have verified data to score this category for these two phones.
Software & longevity400 Pro
Honor 400 Pro
400 Pro is the safer long-term pick (75/100) — Android 15, MagicOS 9 (6yr).

Key differences

400 Pro
90 Pro
Rs. 88,480
Price
Rs. 65,000–82,000 (indicative)
6.7 inches 6.7" OLED 120Hz, 1.5K, HDR
Display
6.78 inches AMOLED, 120Hz
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
200MP OIS
Main camera
200MP wide (f/1.9, PDAF)
5300mAh (Si/C) · 100W wired, 50W wireless
Battery
5000 mAh · 90W wired (no wireless)
Android 15, MagicOS 9 (6yr)
Software
Android 13 (MagicOS 7.1)
Yes
5G
Yes

Full specs

Spec
400 Pro
90 Pro
Size
6.7 inches
6.78 inches
Type
6.7" OLED 120Hz, 1.5K, HDR
AMOLED, 120Hz
Resolution
Protection
Gorilla Glass Victus
Spec
400 Pro
90 Pro
Chipset
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
CPU
Octa-core (1x3.0GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.5GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.8GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU
Adreno 730
Storage
Card slot
No

Seller offers

Seller
Price
Warranty
Stock
Action
Fatafat Sewa (retailer listing)
400 Pro
Rs. 88,480
Checked May 29
Seller warranty — confirm
Check
Fatafat Sewa
400 Pro
Rs. 88,480
Checked May 29
Seller warranty — confirm
Check
We earn no commission on any seller link; sponsored sellers, if any, are labelled. Rankings are editorial, never paid. Disclosure →

Better alternatives

If neither is the right fit, these are worth a look:

Vivo X200 Pro
Rs. 184,999
Higher overall score (90.2/10) than both phones here.
Honor Magic7 Pro
Price on request
Higher overall score (86.8/10) than both phones here.
Honor Magic 7
Price on request
Higher overall score (86.4/10) than both phones here.

Frequently asked questions

These two are closely matched overall. If value matters most, take the cheaper one; if you want the best camera or gaming, follow the category winner above. Both prices are verified with the date checked.
Category winners use official spec data and published review scores, with Nepal price-verification where available. Camera and gaming scores are sensor/chipset-based; real lab tests are added as we run them. Prices are indicative and may differ at point of sale. Methodology → · Affiliate disclosure →